This week we cover the inherent dishonesty of the financial services industry with regard to THE number one global economic fundamental; namely policymakers' ability to inflate money supplies. Keynesian brainwashing gone global while most people just accept vanilla analysis about GDP growth and employment.
We will either have continued economic rebound (as it were) or we will not. But if so, that from which it was birthed will attend its expression and smart investors will be properly aligned with the true dynamics of the 'inflate or die' system.
#74 looks at gold measured in major currencies and gives its view on the state of a would-be global gold bull market. A bunch more stuff is in there as well, but I am tired of being at a computer right now and gotta go for a run.
Final thought is GO USA!! With all due respect to my Canadian friends.
Edit (6:00) And to my Canadian friends, a very sincere congratulations. That was a classic and in the end, Canada got it done. See you in 4 years.
An informal presentation of technical analysis, market ratio analysis, psychology and macro fundamental opinion... along with whatever else is required to stay on the right side of the markets. The premium NFTRH service takes all of these and more to the next level.
"As a technician, I feel that there are few analysts that offer value for me, but you do. Your work on Gold ratios has helped my analysis greatly." --Jordan Roy-Byrne, CMT (The Daily Gold) 4.9.10
Sunday, February 28, 2010
NFTRH 1 Year Ago - Precious Metals
Excerpted from NFTRH22, dated 2/28/09. The message of patience and an intermediate view ultimately paid off as the HUI corrected a bit further and then doubled in the coming months.
Precious Metals
Here at NFTRH, you are not going to get glad-handed. You may not always get swami- like forecasts, but you are going to get the best attempt at accuracy, whether in support of what we may want to hear, or what we do not want to hear. I am assuming you have a level of sophistication with regard to the idea that all healthy markets experience corrections – sometimes significant ones – within a bullish big picture.
The precious metals sector is rife with fundamental believers and always-bullish (and emotional) analysis. After all, it is generally easier to simply ‘set it and forget it’ when the fundamentals are good, which they are and have been for months now. On the other side of the coin are the pure traders, micro-managing every twist, squiggle and broken line on a chart. I believe the best stance is one in the middle of these two because I believe the best performance ultimately comes from a solid fundamental foundation combined with the ability to see the risk of corrections coming and manage that risk accordingly, while remaining ‘in the game’ big picture wise.
Preamble out of the way, let’s get right into the nuts and bolts of what is going on in the precious metals. The following HUI chart includes a look at daily gold and silver in the lower panels. Silver has potential to decline significantly relative to gold, as well as in nominal terms. This will be illustrated later in the report with an up to the minute check on the gold-silver ratio (GSR).
[HUI chart w/ Gold & Silver omitted]
HUI resides at the first of our support levels, as noted on the blog last week, and the question now becomes is this the extent of the correction? It sounds logical that it could be given the rising SMA 50 that proved to be good support in January. You will recall that I had a high confidence level on that plunge to the 50, and bought it. I do not have that level of confidence this time around, although, as you will see later, I have bought back a couple positions and added to another. Also, despite the bearish look of silver, the ZSL short play was covered. That is because I am not a gun slinging trader and I was under-exposed (for me) to the sector. I would rather get the intermediate and big pictures right, and that often dictates taking positions contrary to what I think the short term is going to do. And I think the gold miners are going to decline, short term, possibly to the strong support around 250. This would constitute a major buying opportunity, for which cash should be on hand.
The HUI-Gold ratio (HGR) remains unconstructive as it continues to wallow below the indicator that was our warning trigger, the SMA 50. In fact, that could be a little bear flag implying new lows in the short term.
[Original HGR chart omitted - actually no longer available, but here is a new one reviewing what ultimately happened]
Once again, good cash management is recommended, while keeping an eye on favored gold miners (later in the report a few charts of NFTRH holdings will be shown along with optimal buy/add levels) for low risk opportunities.
This is not a sprint. Amid world wide financial system chaos, gold sits there calmly, perhaps planning to drop to our worst case level of 650, or perhaps planning to hold our best case support of 925.
Gold pays no income. That is because it does not need to compensate you for holding any associated risk. Whatever is likely to unfold – and again, later in the report our scenarios #1 and #2 are looked at for the US dollar, the folks who explore for gold and dig it out of the ground are likely to be well set up to capitalize on the metal’s relative strength to everything else.
If the broad market bottoms and commodities catch a bid near term, gold is likely to under-perform gold mining cost inputs, but as Bob Hoye said in his weekly Howe Street radio interview, the margins are already structurally built in. I could not agree more. Any misperception-driven selling of the miners is an opportunity.
Precious Metals
Here at NFTRH, you are not going to get glad-handed. You may not always get swami- like forecasts, but you are going to get the best attempt at accuracy, whether in support of what we may want to hear, or what we do not want to hear. I am assuming you have a level of sophistication with regard to the idea that all healthy markets experience corrections – sometimes significant ones – within a bullish big picture.
The precious metals sector is rife with fundamental believers and always-bullish (and emotional) analysis. After all, it is generally easier to simply ‘set it and forget it’ when the fundamentals are good, which they are and have been for months now. On the other side of the coin are the pure traders, micro-managing every twist, squiggle and broken line on a chart. I believe the best stance is one in the middle of these two because I believe the best performance ultimately comes from a solid fundamental foundation combined with the ability to see the risk of corrections coming and manage that risk accordingly, while remaining ‘in the game’ big picture wise.
Preamble out of the way, let’s get right into the nuts and bolts of what is going on in the precious metals. The following HUI chart includes a look at daily gold and silver in the lower panels. Silver has potential to decline significantly relative to gold, as well as in nominal terms. This will be illustrated later in the report with an up to the minute check on the gold-silver ratio (GSR).
[HUI chart w/ Gold & Silver omitted]
HUI resides at the first of our support levels, as noted on the blog last week, and the question now becomes is this the extent of the correction? It sounds logical that it could be given the rising SMA 50 that proved to be good support in January. You will recall that I had a high confidence level on that plunge to the 50, and bought it. I do not have that level of confidence this time around, although, as you will see later, I have bought back a couple positions and added to another. Also, despite the bearish look of silver, the ZSL short play was covered. That is because I am not a gun slinging trader and I was under-exposed (for me) to the sector. I would rather get the intermediate and big pictures right, and that often dictates taking positions contrary to what I think the short term is going to do. And I think the gold miners are going to decline, short term, possibly to the strong support around 250. This would constitute a major buying opportunity, for which cash should be on hand.
The HUI-Gold ratio (HGR) remains unconstructive as it continues to wallow below the indicator that was our warning trigger, the SMA 50. In fact, that could be a little bear flag implying new lows in the short term.
[Original HGR chart omitted - actually no longer available, but here is a new one reviewing what ultimately happened]
Once again, good cash management is recommended, while keeping an eye on favored gold miners (later in the report a few charts of NFTRH holdings will be shown along with optimal buy/add levels) for low risk opportunities.
This is not a sprint. Amid world wide financial system chaos, gold sits there calmly, perhaps planning to drop to our worst case level of 650, or perhaps planning to hold our best case support of 925.
Gold pays no income. That is because it does not need to compensate you for holding any associated risk. Whatever is likely to unfold – and again, later in the report our scenarios #1 and #2 are looked at for the US dollar, the folks who explore for gold and dig it out of the ground are likely to be well set up to capitalize on the metal’s relative strength to everything else.
If the broad market bottoms and commodities catch a bid near term, gold is likely to under-perform gold mining cost inputs, but as Bob Hoye said in his weekly Howe Street radio interview, the margins are already structurally built in. I could not agree more. Any misperception-driven selling of the miners is an opportunity.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Uncle Buck
USD Daily: MA 50 crosses above 200, MACD well above zero, AROON trend up and support at 79.50.
USD Weekly: EMA 10 supportive, MACD on verge of big time bull signal and AROON trend up.
USD Monthly: Dealing constructively with strong resistance, MACD okay and will be flat out bullish if it gets above zero. AROON trend up.
So tell me, where are the 'Dollar Collapse' cultists now? You know, the smart guys making a living out of touting the destruction of this intrinsically worthless currency in favor of other more 'sound' currencies? Give me a break.
It's all a confidence game and right now confidence is ping ponging around the globe from the trying to be all things to all people debt note in Europe, to the reserve currency debt note of America to the commodity/resource currencies of Australia and Canada. FOREX jocks are having a blast but most Americans probably think the dollar is still in the tank.
The boring old blogger will simply remind that it is long past time to begin securing your future against these rackets.
USD Weekly: EMA 10 supportive, MACD on verge of big time bull signal and AROON trend up.
USD Monthly: Dealing constructively with strong resistance, MACD okay and will be flat out bullish if it gets above zero. AROON trend up.
So tell me, where are the 'Dollar Collapse' cultists now? You know, the smart guys making a living out of touting the destruction of this intrinsically worthless currency in favor of other more 'sound' currencies? Give me a break.
It's all a confidence game and right now confidence is ping ponging around the globe from the trying to be all things to all people debt note in Europe, to the reserve currency debt note of America to the commodity/resource currencies of Australia and Canada. FOREX jocks are having a blast but most Americans probably think the dollar is still in the tank.
The boring old blogger will simply remind that it is long past time to begin securing your future against these rackets.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Root canal preferable to this
This morning I could not even eat my Cheerios without nearly hitting the ceiling as a spec of whole oat goodness hit the wrong part of my tooth. So when I say that having a root canal is preferable to watching these markets go through the motions of... (choose from)
a) Full Obfuscation '10
b) Full Hubris '10
c) Full Denal '10
d) Full Tout '10
e) All of the above
I am not kidding. I feel like this root canal will be a life changing event, since I like food and wish not to be in fear every time I have some. So, shortly I head out for a relative good time in getting away from the markets.
The pig seems not to be listening to Bernanke, or perhaps it is. Perhaps it is looking to get in line with the reasons that he is so gentle, and confident that he can maintain easy - read: inflationary - policy. The gold sector makes an attempt to disconnect, but really, the gold sector has simply been a downside leader, giving some decent clues for the broad construct. Let's see if the PM's can maintain here.
a) Full Obfuscation '10
b) Full Hubris '10
c) Full Denal '10
d) Full Tout '10
e) All of the above
I am not kidding. I feel like this root canal will be a life changing event, since I like food and wish not to be in fear every time I have some. So, shortly I head out for a relative good time in getting away from the markets.
The pig seems not to be listening to Bernanke, or perhaps it is. Perhaps it is looking to get in line with the reasons that he is so gentle, and confident that he can maintain easy - read: inflationary - policy. The gold sector makes an attempt to disconnect, but really, the gold sector has simply been a downside leader, giving some decent clues for the broad construct. Let's see if the PM's can maintain here.
Today's pre-market email update to subscribers...
Why not pop it up here, just because?
So, is Mr. Bernanke…
a) Stupid?
b) Desperate?
c) Out of touch?
d) In total control?
a) No
b) Yes
c) Possibly to a degree, given the dimming effect academia tends to have on Keynesian types
d) Yeh, right
Still, all the man had to do was utter some gentle words on interest rates and the markets complied for a day at least, with the dollar down, gold down, stock market up and commodities up. You do know that these inflationists WANT commodities up don’t you? That is why I call these people desperate; they know full well that any hoped-for recovery is going to be attended by rising prices and costs given its origins in overdriven money printing. This obviously gives the lie to the Fed’s “Price Stability” mandate.
The attached chart shows the parameters on the short term stock market recovery that we had expected. The SPX along with gold, gold miners, commodities and China all remain at or near resistance levels from which they can turn back down, as expected. I say “can” because my black box, the one with the remote market controls, is shorted out and in the shop for repairs.
Getting back to point a), he is not stupid and the reason I believe he is desperate is that on the surface it seems outrageous that he pretends to be able to control interest rates at near Fed Funds zero. What does he know about the sustainability (lack thereof) of ‘the recovery’? What does he know about the Treasury’s ability to fund itself despite the long bond near crucial biggest picture support? Why dare he not upset the markets at a time when ‘the recovery’ is obviously in play and commodity (and gold) prices have been rising?
It is obvious that Ben sees a strong dollar and intends to play off of that. But what is the dollar recovery other than a reflection of scared money knee jerking out of the suddenly unsound euro. NFTRH you will recall, never considered this alternate confidence note as being sound. It appears Bernanke is playing around in the slop between the global public’s continued confidence in these and other paper debt notes and the day when said confidence hits critical mass to the downside. That will be the day that gold, still looking constructive in most major currencies, is gone for real in a bull market across the board.
Dialing it back in to short term events, review the attached chart. There’s the resistance. Let’s see if hope has some power left or if it will continue to wane.
Regards,
Gary
http://www.biiwii.com
http://www.biiwii.blogspot.com
So, is Mr. Bernanke…
a) Stupid?
b) Desperate?
c) Out of touch?
d) In total control?
a) No
b) Yes
c) Possibly to a degree, given the dimming effect academia tends to have on Keynesian types
d) Yeh, right
Still, all the man had to do was utter some gentle words on interest rates and the markets complied for a day at least, with the dollar down, gold down, stock market up and commodities up. You do know that these inflationists WANT commodities up don’t you? That is why I call these people desperate; they know full well that any hoped-for recovery is going to be attended by rising prices and costs given its origins in overdriven money printing. This obviously gives the lie to the Fed’s “Price Stability” mandate.
The attached chart shows the parameters on the short term stock market recovery that we had expected. The SPX along with gold, gold miners, commodities and China all remain at or near resistance levels from which they can turn back down, as expected. I say “can” because my black box, the one with the remote market controls, is shorted out and in the shop for repairs.
Getting back to point a), he is not stupid and the reason I believe he is desperate is that on the surface it seems outrageous that he pretends to be able to control interest rates at near Fed Funds zero. What does he know about the sustainability (lack thereof) of ‘the recovery’? What does he know about the Treasury’s ability to fund itself despite the long bond near crucial biggest picture support? Why dare he not upset the markets at a time when ‘the recovery’ is obviously in play and commodity (and gold) prices have been rising?
It is obvious that Ben sees a strong dollar and intends to play off of that. But what is the dollar recovery other than a reflection of scared money knee jerking out of the suddenly unsound euro. NFTRH you will recall, never considered this alternate confidence note as being sound. It appears Bernanke is playing around in the slop between the global public’s continued confidence in these and other paper debt notes and the day when said confidence hits critical mass to the downside. That will be the day that gold, still looking constructive in most major currencies, is gone for real in a bull market across the board.
Dialing it back in to short term events, review the attached chart. There’s the resistance. Let’s see if hope has some power left or if it will continue to wane.
Regards,
Gary
http://www.biiwii.com
http://www.biiwii.blogspot.com
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
So, how do we Square Bernanke's comments?
The thing I keep coming back to in my mind is that no sane person would have the balls to go on record as the Fed chief has done without strong evidence (that has perhaps not yet been made clear enough for the major media to get hysterical over) that things are about to get much worse than those fantasizing about a real economic recovery would like to believe.
The Fed will lose all credibility [to answer the quote by Captain Obvious in the previous post] if the bond breaks down (rates break out to the upside). Here is the long bond proxy, TLT benefiting due to the stock market's weakness yesterday and Bernanke's jawbone today.
People looking at individual stocks or commodities are really missing the most exciting drama play out in the macro that I can remember. That includes the hysterics of Q4, 2008 which had of course turned out to be the result of the unsustainable policies that many of us had chronicled for years before.
The Fed will lose all credibility [to answer the quote by Captain Obvious in the previous post] if the bond breaks down (rates break out to the upside). Here is the long bond proxy, TLT benefiting due to the stock market's weakness yesterday and Bernanke's jawbone today.
People looking at individual stocks or commodities are really missing the most exciting drama play out in the macro that I can remember. That includes the hysterics of Q4, 2008 which had of course turned out to be the result of the unsustainable policies that many of us had chronicled for years before.
A sample of this week's financial media pablum
US Stocks Advance as Bernanke Says Fed Rate to Remain Low
Suggested alternate title: In Defiance of Reality (and the Treasury Market) Fed Chief Pumps in All Out Effort to Keep Naive Public Buying Stocks.
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks rose, halting a two-day drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the economy still requires low interest rates to spur demand.
Keynes' ghost is happy.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. paced gainsin banks after Bernanke told Congress in prepared remarks that the “nascent” recovery will warrant “exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.”
“The market is breathing a sigh of relief that he didn’t say anything hawkish,” said John Kattar, chief investment officer at Eastern Investment Advisors in Boston, which manages $1.6 billion. “The Fed is trying to walk a very fine line between satisfying the tremendous political pressures on them and maintaining credibility.”
U.S. stocks retreated yesterday after a gauge of consumer confidence decreased to the lowest level since April 2009, spurring concern the economic rebound will slow.
I have mixed views of this since 'da pub' can be considered a reliable contrary indicator, except of course when they are struggling so badly that there is no denying the pain - except by officials in cushy offices.
The S&P 500 is down 4.8 percent since reaching a 15-month high on Jan. 19 as growing concern about widening budget gaps in Greece, Portugal and Spain helped spur a retreat.
PIGS are a symptom, not a cause.
Bernanke began his semi-annual monetary policy testimony before the House Financial Services Committee as the Fed wrestles with unwinding economic stimulus programs without worsening an unemployment rate that the central bank forecasts at 9.5 percent to 9.7 percent in the fourth quarter.
Inflate or die Benny boy... inflate or die.
Suggested alternate title: In Defiance of Reality (and the Treasury Market) Fed Chief Pumps in All Out Effort to Keep Naive Public Buying Stocks.
Feb. 24 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks rose, halting a two-day drop in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the economy still requires low interest rates to spur demand.
Keynes' ghost is happy.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corp. paced gainsin banks after Bernanke told Congress in prepared remarks that the “nascent” recovery will warrant “exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.”
This guy does not fool around. But at least he is consistent as he gave us the heads up on his unmitigated inflationist views as far back as 2002's speech 'Why It [Deflation] Will Never Happen Here'. Never say never Ben.
“The market is breathing a sigh of relief that he didn’t say anything hawkish,” said John Kattar, chief investment officer at Eastern Investment Advisors in Boston, which manages $1.6 billion. “The Fed is trying to walk a very fine line between satisfying the tremendous political pressures on them and maintaining credibility.”
This week's financial talking head CIO punchline courtesy of Mr. Kattar.
U.S. stocks retreated yesterday after a gauge of consumer confidence decreased to the lowest level since April 2009, spurring concern the economic rebound will slow.
I have mixed views of this since 'da pub' can be considered a reliable contrary indicator, except of course when they are struggling so badly that there is no denying the pain - except by officials in cushy offices.
The S&P 500 is down 4.8 percent since reaching a 15-month high on Jan. 19 as growing concern about widening budget gaps in Greece, Portugal and Spain helped spur a retreat.
PIGS are a symptom, not a cause.
Bernanke began his semi-annual monetary policy testimony before the House Financial Services Committee as the Fed wrestles with unwinding economic stimulus programs without worsening an unemployment rate that the central bank forecasts at 9.5 percent to 9.7 percent in the fourth quarter.
Inflate or die Benny boy... inflate or die.
NFTRH73 Excerpt: Confidence, Step 1
The ongoing NFTRH thesis has been that the Federal Reserve System, the US Treasury and ultimately the government’s ability to fund its adventures will be severely compromised without the confidence of the Treasury bond market. This is the reason we have followed the 100 month EMA “line in the sand” on the long bond as the yield has risen steadily out of the destruction of Armageddon ’08.
With rates rising toward a level that constitutes a secular change to a decades-long continuum of compliant interest rates, the desperation on the part of policy makers – whether admitted publicly or not – must be palpable. Step 1 toward confidence: The Fed raises its discount lending rate (or emergency loan rate) by a ¼ point to .75%.
The first segment of today’s report is being written Friday, pre-market specifically so that it will not be influenced by the opening of the US market and the millions of combined emotional decisions that will go into this Op/Ex extravaganza. Regardless of today’s fallout or lack thereof, the Fed has made the first move in acknowledging the forces in play, to which it must submit.
Folks, this is not brain surgery. We have looked at this simple picture many times, but to the writer (and the thesis), it is so profound that it remains front and center at all times. Break and hold above that line (EMA 100), and prepare for asymmetry or even perhaps, an end to the system as we know it. I would think the people in charge of [the] system would not like that very much. Hence, they would dearly like the line to hold.
The gentle, decades-long downward slope of the long bond yield chart implies confidence, whether real or manufactured, against which the government funds itself. It is imperative to policy makers that rates back off of that line because with the potential Inverted Head & Shoulders pattern we have looked at by weekly charts and with the outward signs of evaporating confidence, the risk is just too high of a game changing event.
Pressures had been building within the system all throughout the inflation-born recovery from 2003 to 2007. Going back to a theme I used to highlight frequently during this most recent cyclical bull, newly printed ‘funny munny’ is borrowed into existence and then seeks to become real, to transform itself, through investment. But really, it is just hot money looking for speculation. Or is it the other way around?
Some of the ‘munny’ landed in vital resources (commodities), but massive amounts were funneled into Ponzi rackets like mortgage and credit market speculation and specially engineered derivatives vehicles sliced, diced and put up for sale by the happy troubadours on Wall Street.
The smartest of the ‘munny’ looked to the sound monetary anchor, gold, and got in… quickly. Why was gold the smartest route to go? Well, the crash of 2008 showed why. As the entire inflationary construct melted down, gold declined as well in USD terms but, as we all know, held relative value and quickly regained footing to new nominal (USD) highs. Gold is the barometer to the climate of monetary policy.
NFTRH will never seek to be a ‘go gold!’ rag and in fact, its writer wishes he could believe that the Fed’s initial hint toward sound policy was anything other than a move coerced by the chart above. The goal should not be to root for a shiny metal and rail against society as all too many gold bugs tend to do. The goal should be a more sane and whole society. Yes I know, keep on dreaming Gary. But theoretically, gold is a tool. You don’t eat it, you don’t make friends with it and it does not listen when you tell it your problems. Use it for what it is, but don’t get lost in its meaning.
So to summarize, I would rather have a Fed and a Treasury that really care about doing the right thing as opposed to doing what they need to do to continue on with business as usual; even if it meant gold going back to $300/oz. I do not believe however that we have anything close to this dynamic in play and I continue to project the metal to the $2200 an ounce range over the next very few years, for those keeping score at home.
For now, the Fed makes the first small step toward reloading the gun. They will surely need the ammo for when the current construct, born of inflationary policies once again, begins to unwind. Ironically, it may be the Fed’s own actions – forced upon them though they may be – that eventually unwind hopeful markets and a recovering economy, before the whole game of cat and mouse begins anew. It is either that or the treasury market gets out of control in a rebellion that severely transforms the current system, with funny munny – created in the most recent inflation by policy – in an all out panic, seeking assets and driving up prices (blowing up the Fed’s comical ‘price stability’ mandate).
With rates rising toward a level that constitutes a secular change to a decades-long continuum of compliant interest rates, the desperation on the part of policy makers – whether admitted publicly or not – must be palpable. Step 1 toward confidence: The Fed raises its discount lending rate (or emergency loan rate) by a ¼ point to .75%.
The first segment of today’s report is being written Friday, pre-market specifically so that it will not be influenced by the opening of the US market and the millions of combined emotional decisions that will go into this Op/Ex extravaganza. Regardless of today’s fallout or lack thereof, the Fed has made the first move in acknowledging the forces in play, to which it must submit.
Folks, this is not brain surgery. We have looked at this simple picture many times, but to the writer (and the thesis), it is so profound that it remains front and center at all times. Break and hold above that line (EMA 100), and prepare for asymmetry or even perhaps, an end to the system as we know it. I would think the people in charge of [the] system would not like that very much. Hence, they would dearly like the line to hold.
The gentle, decades-long downward slope of the long bond yield chart implies confidence, whether real or manufactured, against which the government funds itself. It is imperative to policy makers that rates back off of that line because with the potential Inverted Head & Shoulders pattern we have looked at by weekly charts and with the outward signs of evaporating confidence, the risk is just too high of a game changing event.
Pressures had been building within the system all throughout the inflation-born recovery from 2003 to 2007. Going back to a theme I used to highlight frequently during this most recent cyclical bull, newly printed ‘funny munny’ is borrowed into existence and then seeks to become real, to transform itself, through investment. But really, it is just hot money looking for speculation. Or is it the other way around?
Some of the ‘munny’ landed in vital resources (commodities), but massive amounts were funneled into Ponzi rackets like mortgage and credit market speculation and specially engineered derivatives vehicles sliced, diced and put up for sale by the happy troubadours on Wall Street.
The smartest of the ‘munny’ looked to the sound monetary anchor, gold, and got in… quickly. Why was gold the smartest route to go? Well, the crash of 2008 showed why. As the entire inflationary construct melted down, gold declined as well in USD terms but, as we all know, held relative value and quickly regained footing to new nominal (USD) highs. Gold is the barometer to the climate of monetary policy.
NFTRH will never seek to be a ‘go gold!’ rag and in fact, its writer wishes he could believe that the Fed’s initial hint toward sound policy was anything other than a move coerced by the chart above. The goal should not be to root for a shiny metal and rail against society as all too many gold bugs tend to do. The goal should be a more sane and whole society. Yes I know, keep on dreaming Gary. But theoretically, gold is a tool. You don’t eat it, you don’t make friends with it and it does not listen when you tell it your problems. Use it for what it is, but don’t get lost in its meaning.
So to summarize, I would rather have a Fed and a Treasury that really care about doing the right thing as opposed to doing what they need to do to continue on with business as usual; even if it meant gold going back to $300/oz. I do not believe however that we have anything close to this dynamic in play and I continue to project the metal to the $2200 an ounce range over the next very few years, for those keeping score at home.
For now, the Fed makes the first small step toward reloading the gun. They will surely need the ammo for when the current construct, born of inflationary policies once again, begins to unwind. Ironically, it may be the Fed’s own actions – forced upon them though they may be – that eventually unwind hopeful markets and a recovering economy, before the whole game of cat and mouse begins anew. It is either that or the treasury market gets out of control in a rebellion that severely transforms the current system, with funny munny – created in the most recent inflation by policy – in an all out panic, seeking assets and driving up prices (blowing up the Fed’s comical ‘price stability’ mandate).
Introducing the 6th grade Spelling B champion...
Speaking of kids, my daughter Isabela is 6th grade champ and 3rd in the school (beaten only by a 7th and an 8th grader in a nail biter last night). I am as proud of that as I am of her hard work to pull up to all A's after deciding that was a goal she wanted to achieve (It's not in the genes, I'll tell you that).
Hard work, it's what it's all about. Now, we focus on her softball hitting swing. We have been practicing two nights a week since January for the coming spring season. I think she can be a real slugger with wiry strength and a sweet swing.
Dad's not pushing her. She just loves to participate, in probably too many things. It has not been a breeze for us with this kid (or her sister, who's following in her tracks) but what a year. Things are really rounding into form.
Hard work, it's what it's all about. Now, we focus on her softball hitting swing. We have been practicing two nights a week since January for the coming spring season. I think she can be a real slugger with wiry strength and a sweet swing.
Dad's not pushing her. She just loves to participate, in probably too many things. It has not been a breeze for us with this kid (or her sister, who's following in her tracks) but what a year. Things are really rounding into form.
Mr. Obama & Me
I had a short dream vignette last night that may actually have been a wish... In the dream, President Obama came in the room and got right up in my face - almost nose to nose, I was thinking "gee, I hope my breath is okay" (I was asleep after all).
Mr. Obama boomed something in his usual assured manner to the effect of "Now, Mr. Tanashian, why is it that you and all other neigh sayers like you have to be so negative on the economy, the society and on what is possible? What is wrong with a message of hope?"
To which I responded with something along the lines of "Mr. President, I would love to be positive and hopeful if these sentiments were grounded in reality. I have children after all, and I want nothing but the best for them and all kids inheriting the world we leave for them. But sir, the policies you promote, while beneficial to some, are made possible only through increasing already unmanageable national debt. You are selling hope in the here and now, but you are borrowing from the future to do it. I - a fairly conservative person - actually agree with some of your ideas in spirit given the levels of criminality that took hold in high places, ushering in the destruction of our economy and possibly our society as we knew it. But how can you tell me that it is possible to fix anything by printing and spending to create government positions at a historic rate when we were already broke to begin with? What's next, is the government going to legislate an end to the fiscal, financial and economic problems?"
I think I have been looking at that long bond yield too long. Dohhh.
Mr. Obama boomed something in his usual assured manner to the effect of "Now, Mr. Tanashian, why is it that you and all other neigh sayers like you have to be so negative on the economy, the society and on what is possible? What is wrong with a message of hope?"
To which I responded with something along the lines of "Mr. President, I would love to be positive and hopeful if these sentiments were grounded in reality. I have children after all, and I want nothing but the best for them and all kids inheriting the world we leave for them. But sir, the policies you promote, while beneficial to some, are made possible only through increasing already unmanageable national debt. You are selling hope in the here and now, but you are borrowing from the future to do it. I - a fairly conservative person - actually agree with some of your ideas in spirit given the levels of criminality that took hold in high places, ushering in the destruction of our economy and possibly our society as we knew it. But how can you tell me that it is possible to fix anything by printing and spending to create government positions at a historic rate when we were already broke to begin with? What's next, is the government going to legislate an end to the fiscal, financial and economic problems?"
I think I have been looking at that long bond yield too long. Dohhh.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
How to play the biggest & most important bond market in the world...
In light of the longer term treasury rates status at 'do or die' levels (signifying the inflection point at which the macro switch either remains status quo or gets flipped as inflationary horses break down the barn door) I have gotten a few emails asking about TBT (short the long bond) as a possible play. My advice? I ain't playin' nothin'.
If the switch flips, players may want to short the long bond. But my personal tack is to sit and wait for opportunity in sound things, like gold and gold stocks (well, to the extent that stocks can be thought of as sound). Later, things like resources and productive economies and sectors. But as for the treasury play, I shorted and longed the long bond successfully in 2009 and have no interest in going back for more at this time. That is because if you slop around with pigs long enough, you risk becoming one.
But I did buy more treasuries today and the attached charts show why. They are linear and log scale versions of the 3 month t-bill rate, showing both the low relative rate and the percentage move off the bottom. While pathetically low in the face of systematic and destructive inflationary policy, one might argue that there is no place to go but up (as the Fed wishy washily admitted last week). Treasury investors OWN T-BILLS IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT. So, with the short end beginning to yield (no pun intended) to the pressures of the long end, I added positions in SHV in the speculative portfolio, as a place to park cash while awaiting more dynamic opportunity. Best case, I'll get fast turnover on rising rates, protection as good as government paper can get and increasing return. Worst case (if short rates somehow get re-pinned to the mat) there is the liquidity and protection (such as it is) of t-bills.
Other ways to play this are 'treasury only' money markets (Prechter put me on this course in 2002 with Conquer the Crash) or buying t-bills directly from Uncle Sam.
If the switch flips, players may want to short the long bond. But my personal tack is to sit and wait for opportunity in sound things, like gold and gold stocks (well, to the extent that stocks can be thought of as sound). Later, things like resources and productive economies and sectors. But as for the treasury play, I shorted and longed the long bond successfully in 2009 and have no interest in going back for more at this time. That is because if you slop around with pigs long enough, you risk becoming one.
But I did buy more treasuries today and the attached charts show why. They are linear and log scale versions of the 3 month t-bill rate, showing both the low relative rate and the percentage move off the bottom. While pathetically low in the face of systematic and destructive inflationary policy, one might argue that there is no place to go but up (as the Fed wishy washily admitted last week). Treasury investors OWN T-BILLS IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT. So, with the short end beginning to yield (no pun intended) to the pressures of the long end, I added positions in SHV in the speculative portfolio, as a place to park cash while awaiting more dynamic opportunity. Best case, I'll get fast turnover on rising rates, protection as good as government paper can get and increasing return. Worst case (if short rates somehow get re-pinned to the mat) there is the liquidity and protection (such as it is) of t-bills.
Other ways to play this are 'treasury only' money markets (Prechter put me on this course in 2002 with Conquer the Crash) or buying t-bills directly from Uncle Sam.
The "Too Big to Fail" Lie (as applied to banks) --Saville
As long as Steve Saville is going keep writing things that I think are must reading, I guess I am going to highlight them here. A lot of worth-while things are published and linked here on the Biiwii Analysis page, but lately Saville is standing out.
Please read The "Too Big to Fail" Lie (as applied to banks), as it is yet another strong piece by a well researched and well grounded writer. BTW, I have no relationship with Mr. Saville other than he is one of the guest contributors to Biiwii.com. Due to a lack of free time (not complaining, mind you), I have had to whittle the list down. Saville is one of the few I would keep on the roster however, until such time as I would decide to can the entire exercise. I consider the essentials to be the likes of Saville, Hoye, Hussman, Mish and a few others.
"Unfortunately, the "too big to fail" lie is still going strong. From the government's perspective, the theory that the financial crisis had a lot to do with the sizes of banks* is just too good to let go. This is because it not only provides justification for the huge wealth transfer of 2008-2009 and diverts blame from the government and the Fed; it also creates an opportunity for the regulators to be seen as saviours rather than culprits."
Please read The "Too Big to Fail" Lie (as applied to banks), as it is yet another strong piece by a well researched and well grounded writer. BTW, I have no relationship with Mr. Saville other than he is one of the guest contributors to Biiwii.com. Due to a lack of free time (not complaining, mind you), I have had to whittle the list down. Saville is one of the few I would keep on the roster however, until such time as I would decide to can the entire exercise. I consider the essentials to be the likes of Saville, Hoye, Hussman, Mish and a few others.
"Unfortunately, the "too big to fail" lie is still going strong. From the government's perspective, the theory that the financial crisis had a lot to do with the sizes of banks* is just too good to let go. This is because it not only provides justification for the huge wealth transfer of 2008-2009 and diverts blame from the government and the Fed; it also creates an opportunity for the regulators to be seen as saviours rather than culprits."
Monday, February 22, 2010
10 Year Yield - Pretty cut & dry
An email exchange with a subscriber got me looking at the $TNX. You do of course know that the blue line corresponds to absolutely profound would-be market, economic and monetary events right? That line, to the extent that it holds or breaks, will provide the signal as to whether to prepare for intensifying inflation fears or potentially deflationary ones.
I mean, it is just awesome to think we are straddling one silly line on an interest rate chart and that that line could be for all the marbles, considering the important decisions people are going to have to make with regard to their financial livelihood. Depending on which side of the line holds sway, the two sets of decisions will be very different. How is the government going to fund itself if it cannot sell treasury bonds and then print money with the proceeds?
I mean, it is just awesome to think we are straddling one silly line on an interest rate chart and that that line could be for all the marbles, considering the important decisions people are going to have to make with regard to their financial livelihood. Depending on which side of the line holds sway, the two sets of decisions will be very different. How is the government going to fund itself if it cannot sell treasury bonds and then print money with the proceeds?
USA... Yeh baby!
Anyone catch that barn burner last night? Ryan Miller played out of his mind in goal and the team gritted it out against a furious Canadian onslaught. Great hockey. Being a Ranger fan, I was pleased to see Drury and Callahan grit it out defensively for the US.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Marc Faber on gold
Marc Faber during an interview w/ Jim Puplava last week:
"As long as we have academics like Larry Summers, Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner running the economic policies in the United States - as long as you have these people - I will never sell my gold and I continue to recommend people not to be market timers in gold because the market timers in gold... most of them don't own any gold anymore; they already sold it and are always waiting for a deep enough correction to buy it. What people should do is gradually accumulate gold and forget about temporary fluctuations."
There is a reason this grand daddy of newsletter writers is so popular. The message is so simple yet so beyond the reach of the average casino patron. I don't know how well I have veiled my contempt for the day traders and commodity jocks to whom everything is a play. Not very well, I suspect.
One might think of me as a pro-gold booster, but all I have ever said - "gold is not about price, it is about value" - was taught to me early on in my financial awakening. Now, NFTRH73 includes some words to the effect that the shiny stuff should not be worshiped but rather, used simply as a monetary tool in a time of extreme monetary stress.
Hype and emotion are KILLERS of people who wade into the gold market without the proper perspective.
"As long as we have academics like Larry Summers, Ben Bernanke and Tim Geithner running the economic policies in the United States - as long as you have these people - I will never sell my gold and I continue to recommend people not to be market timers in gold because the market timers in gold... most of them don't own any gold anymore; they already sold it and are always waiting for a deep enough correction to buy it. What people should do is gradually accumulate gold and forget about temporary fluctuations."
There is a reason this grand daddy of newsletter writers is so popular. The message is so simple yet so beyond the reach of the average casino patron. I don't know how well I have veiled my contempt for the day traders and commodity jocks to whom everything is a play. Not very well, I suspect.
One might think of me as a pro-gold booster, but all I have ever said - "gold is not about price, it is about value" - was taught to me early on in my financial awakening. Now, NFTRH73 includes some words to the effect that the shiny stuff should not be worshiped but rather, used simply as a monetary tool in a time of extreme monetary stress.
Hype and emotion are KILLERS of people who wade into the gold market without the proper perspective.
NFTRH73 Out Now
Perspective... maintain perspective as the noise and crosscurrents swirl. Yup, that's what NFTRH73 does.
NFTRH73, out now.
NFTRH73, out now.
NFTRH 1 Year Ago - Commodities
One year ago, the Dow was headed imminently for the final washout, the gold sector had done the heavy lifting coming out of Armageddon '08 and was now set up to take a back seat to commodities and the entire reflation play. China and the BDI did indeed signal a glimmer of 'hope' pending the final washout.
A short blurb from #21, dated 2/21/09:
Commodities
Commodity charts generally look awful, after having shown signs of attempted bottoms. Obviously, the two scenarios noted above come into play here and since the dollar’s fate is not yet resolved, neither is that of the commodity complex.
One positive sign is the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), which has risen strongly off of the bottom. Somebody is beginning to ship something somewhere and I believe I read on an NFTRH subscriber’s daily note that it is due to China’s stimulative efforts. As an aside, unlike the US and its welfare package designed to impoverish the entire country with more un-payable debt, China has actual reserves that it can put to work. It was mentioned in Friday’s update that MACD’s in most markets looked bad, with the exception of China. That market may be one to keep an eye on going forward from a relative strength perspective.
Here is the BDI, lonely bullish sentinel that it is.
[BDI chart omitted]
A short blurb from #21, dated 2/21/09:
Commodities
Commodity charts generally look awful, after having shown signs of attempted bottoms. Obviously, the two scenarios noted above come into play here and since the dollar’s fate is not yet resolved, neither is that of the commodity complex.
One positive sign is the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), which has risen strongly off of the bottom. Somebody is beginning to ship something somewhere and I believe I read on an NFTRH subscriber’s daily note that it is due to China’s stimulative efforts. As an aside, unlike the US and its welfare package designed to impoverish the entire country with more un-payable debt, China has actual reserves that it can put to work. It was mentioned in Friday’s update that MACD’s in most markets looked bad, with the exception of China. That market may be one to keep an eye on going forward from a relative strength perspective.
Here is the BDI, lonely bullish sentinel that it is.
[BDI chart omitted]
Friday, February 19, 2010
Treasury Metals
I already liked CEO Marc Henderson and his habit of buying LAM.to stock in the open market. Then Otto whispered a sweet nothing in my ear about another of Henderson's companies, gold explorer Treasury Metals (TML.to). I took a look at the chart, felt that NFTRH could use another good gold exploration play in the speculative portfolio and bought just above support, as shown.
Now what pops into the blogger's mind is how he took profits on FIS.v in the range of 130% when he could have held out for nearly 400%, all for a month and a half hold. Alas, it could not be because I am not engaged with uranium (yet) the way I am with the gold sector. So maybe it will not be so difficult for me to hold on through with TML. Oh and both Mr. Henderson and his other company, Laramide, have bought some shares recently in the public market paying more, on average than I did. Maybe I should just hitch my wagon to his star for a while? Maybe?
Anyway, there's the support, there's the consolidation and there's a nice up leg in progress. You know, I honestly do have fun with individual stocks. Maybe I should can the dour macro lecturing for a while and just enjoy life. Sound like a plan?
Have a great weekend, and keep an eye out for the CoT reports due shortly. You can get 'em hot of the press here when they come out at 3:30 (US Eastern): Commitments of Traders.
Now what pops into the blogger's mind is how he took profits on FIS.v in the range of 130% when he could have held out for nearly 400%, all for a month and a half hold. Alas, it could not be because I am not engaged with uranium (yet) the way I am with the gold sector. So maybe it will not be so difficult for me to hold on through with TML. Oh and both Mr. Henderson and his other company, Laramide, have bought some shares recently in the public market paying more, on average than I did. Maybe I should just hitch my wagon to his star for a while? Maybe?
Anyway, there's the support, there's the consolidation and there's a nice up leg in progress. You know, I honestly do have fun with individual stocks. Maybe I should can the dour macro lecturing for a while and just enjoy life. Sound like a plan?
Have a great weekend, and keep an eye out for the CoT reports due shortly. You can get 'em hot of the press here when they come out at 3:30 (US Eastern): Commitments of Traders.
More on the Discount Rate hike...
Well, this gentleman asks the following question in an AP news blurb this morning:
"It begs the questions of why this was not done, or at least signaled at a regular Federal Open Market Committee meeting" said Marc Ostwald, strategist at Monument Securities in London.
Come on Marc, you are a strategist at Monument Securities for crying out loud, put on your strategizing cap. Very generally, do not think for one minute officials have not been watching and stressing over the state of the market driven rate of interest. Inflationary policy of 2008/2009 has manifested in economic uptick and with it, interest rates even as current money supply growth has gone flat line to down (rut roh).
In essence, the yield on the long bond is saying "Okay, recovery is in gear and we want sound policy now that the crisis is averted... and we don't care whether or not the recovery is sustainable. In fact, we want a higher rate of interest ESPECIALLY if it is not sustainable."
The Fed is simply bending over or at least giving the first small indication that it realizes it must obey the bond market. Nothing more, nothing less. I will bet they hope to get some meaningful play on a declining bond yield right here and now, given their pretense toward sound policy. I'll bet they are praying they don't have to inject sound policy for real, Volcker style. That is because when all the unproductive money supply ramping and subsequent stimulus begins to roll over onto its own big, bloated ass, the entire soufflé is likely to just wheeze and deflate.
This is all a game of appearances. It's why that picture there to the right shows a girl named Alice and a lot of strange creatures there with her; it's a fantasy, an illusion. We are sadly in a late stage system where desperate people fly airplanes into IRS buildings in a last chance power drive born of things they don't fully understand, yet know are all screwed up.
Experienced market watchers know that you do not react to the news of the moment but rather, you look into the mechanics of what policy makers are looking into to get early clues on the policy that will follow. You don't listen to and immediately react to their words. You build a model, an ongoing theme and you adjust it as needed based on what you see happening in the markets.
What is happening now is simple. The treasury bond market is telling officials that they have red-lined the panicky inflation policy and the engine is going to blow unless it is cooled down. Nothing more, nothing less.
"It begs the questions of why this was not done, or at least signaled at a regular Federal Open Market Committee meeting" said Marc Ostwald, strategist at Monument Securities in London.
Come on Marc, you are a strategist at Monument Securities for crying out loud, put on your strategizing cap. Very generally, do not think for one minute officials have not been watching and stressing over the state of the market driven rate of interest. Inflationary policy of 2008/2009 has manifested in economic uptick and with it, interest rates even as current money supply growth has gone flat line to down (rut roh).
In essence, the yield on the long bond is saying "Okay, recovery is in gear and we want sound policy now that the crisis is averted... and we don't care whether or not the recovery is sustainable. In fact, we want a higher rate of interest ESPECIALLY if it is not sustainable."
The Fed is simply bending over or at least giving the first small indication that it realizes it must obey the bond market. Nothing more, nothing less. I will bet they hope to get some meaningful play on a declining bond yield right here and now, given their pretense toward sound policy. I'll bet they are praying they don't have to inject sound policy for real, Volcker style. That is because when all the unproductive money supply ramping and subsequent stimulus begins to roll over onto its own big, bloated ass, the entire soufflé is likely to just wheeze and deflate.
This is all a game of appearances. It's why that picture there to the right shows a girl named Alice and a lot of strange creatures there with her; it's a fantasy, an illusion. We are sadly in a late stage system where desperate people fly airplanes into IRS buildings in a last chance power drive born of things they don't fully understand, yet know are all screwed up.
Experienced market watchers know that you do not react to the news of the moment but rather, you look into the mechanics of what policy makers are looking into to get early clues on the policy that will follow. You don't listen to and immediately react to their words. You build a model, an ongoing theme and you adjust it as needed based on what you see happening in the markets.
What is happening now is simple. The treasury bond market is telling officials that they have red-lined the panicky inflation policy and the engine is going to blow unless it is cooled down. Nothing more, nothing less.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Fed Raises by 1/4
You do see this clearly don't you? Fed Raises Discount Rate to .75%
You see that the Fed is only doing what that T-bond yield chart in the previous post has demanded they do. You read the blogger every Fed day chirping on about how the Fed will decide nothing, it's the bond market that will make the decisions. You read about the need for another deflation scare type event to put some bullets back in the Fed's chamber.
The treasury bond is cooked if the secular 'line in the sand' breaks. Absolutely cooked, as in new system here we come. They don't want a new system. They like the existing one just fine. Despite the spin that this is just normal activity for a recovering economy, you just know these guys are doing what they must do, or they are out of business.
This is why I harp on the damn t-bond charts all the time.
You see that the Fed is only doing what that T-bond yield chart in the previous post has demanded they do. You read the blogger every Fed day chirping on about how the Fed will decide nothing, it's the bond market that will make the decisions. You read about the need for another deflation scare type event to put some bullets back in the Fed's chamber.
The treasury bond is cooked if the secular 'line in the sand' breaks. Absolutely cooked, as in new system here we come. They don't want a new system. They like the existing one just fine. Despite the spin that this is just normal activity for a recovering economy, you just know these guys are doing what they must do, or they are out of business.
This is why I harp on the damn t-bond charts all the time.
Bonk
Bounce target acheived... that's the preferred target. Now we'll see what the actual landing zone is.
Meanwhile, policy makers are running out of rope here...
Okay, enough of this mess for today. I am going for a run.
Meanwhile, policy makers are running out of rope here...
Okay, enough of this mess for today. I am going for a run.
IMF Gold Sales
This is a Kabuki dance that world monetary officials go through on occasion in an effort to keep up appearances, announcing large sales of gold (often while it is in a bullish stance) as if anyone who looks at the situation rationally does not understand what is in play; namely macro slight of hand.
FWIW, I agree with Trader Dan here. This comes by way of one of those Jim Sinclair emails. I sometimes use these as contrary indicators and other times as useful information. Today's falls into the latter category. The IMF is but one powerful global entity that constantly screws with the natural economic order of things; everything from entire countries to the hated (by officials) honest monetary anchor to stability, gold.
FWIW, I agree with Trader Dan here. This comes by way of one of those Jim Sinclair emails. I sometimes use these as contrary indicators and other times as useful information. Today's falls into the latter category. The IMF is but one powerful global entity that constantly screws with the natural economic order of things; everything from entire countries to the hated (by officials) honest monetary anchor to stability, gold.
Dear Friends,
After the pit session trade had already closed for the day in New York, news came out that the IMF was planning on selling the remainder of 403.3 tons of gold, 191.3 to be exact, on the open market. Gold was immediately taken down hard in the thin trading conditions, dropping more than $14 on the day.
There are several things about this that should be noted. First is the timing – it comes on the heels of a resumption of the uptrend in gold with many technical indicators having moved into the buy mode. It also coincides with another brand new all time high in the price of Gold priced in Euro terms at the London PM Fix.
Those of us who have been around the gold market long enough know full well that the timing of this announcement is therefore no coincidence but was timed to attempt to derail the returning bullish sentiment in the yellow metal. Why announce the sale publicly which is guaranteed to receive a lower price for the metal than if the IMF had just quietly sold the metal into the market. This is reminiscent of then Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s announcement that England intended to sell its hoard of gold. That guaranteed that Britain would receive the lowest price possible.
Secondly, China was one-upped by India’s purchase of some 200 tons of gold late last year and got caught flat footed. The spin on this gold sale is that the IMF announcing that they would sell the gold into the open market means that Central Bank demand for gold is not as vibrant as the market was led to believe. That is an interesting tall tale. The simple truth is that Central Banks do not generally buy gold and announce their intentions to do so beforehand. Neither do they tend to buy when prices are moving higher as the momentum based hedge funds do. Time and time again we have seen that the CBs buy gold during episodes of price weakness. Once news hit the wire last year that India had bought 200 tons of gold, the price never looked back and shot straight to $1220+. Any Asian Central Bank that missed buying the gold as a result is certainly not going to panic and rush into the market to obtain it. They are waiting for lower prices where they will acquire the metal. To state therefore that Central Bank demand for gold must not be as robust as originally thought is quite shallow analysis.
My view is that this announcement means nothing in the longer term scheme but was rather a cheap trick to take the market lower. We have already seen this week how some noted elites were pooh-poohing gold and trash talking the metal all the while they were acquiring a position in it. Nothing ever changes in this gold market. It is still one of the least transparent markets on the planet and perhaps the most prone to official sector interference.
Do not be disturbed by the news. It is probably going to be a one or two day wonder and then that will be it. Gold will then go back to trading the currencies taking its cues from the action in the Dollar.
Incidentally, this sale is supposedly going to be phased in over an extended period of time. Rest assured, the IMF would love nothing better than to sell the whole 191 tons in one lump sum to another Asian Central Bank.
Respectfully,
Trader Dan
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
US Manufacturing on the Upswing
Meanwhile, this showed up in my inbox not a minute ago. BTW, it is true. I know from boots on the ground experience. It is great, and it is what a declining home currency will do for a sector like this. This is one reason it usually does not pay to be net bearish against an inflationary regime.
Of course it is sponsored by Cisco, a company about which I hear conflicting anecdotal reports concerning their supposedly robust business climate. So that is the caveat.
This comes by way of Managing Automation.
Of course it is sponsored by Cisco, a company about which I hear conflicting anecdotal reports concerning their supposedly robust business climate. So that is the caveat.
This comes by way of Managing Automation.
MANUFACTURERS’ CONFIDENCE IN THE ECONOMY, BUSINESS PROSPECTS RISE DRAMATICALLY IN MANAGING AUTOMATION MEDIA’S READER POLL
Manufacturers across the U.S. and Europe say that their feelings about the health of their economies and their own business prospects going into 2010 have improved by a wide margin since late 2009. The new poll, fielded last month, shows that a strong majority of manufacturers in the U.S. and Europe – 57% and 55%, respectively – expect their economies to improve moderately in 2010. Last year, this key measure of confidence dropped to 26% in the U.S. and nearly collapsed in Europe at 13%.
Join David Brousell, two manufacturers who participated in the poll and Cisco to hear their outlook for 2010.
Hear about:
In addition to confidence levels, the poll also examines reader attitudes with regard to technology budget plans and product purchase intentions for 2010.
Manufacturers across the U.S. and Europe say that their feelings about the health of their economies and their own business prospects going into 2010 have improved by a wide margin since late 2009. The new poll, fielded last month, shows that a strong majority of manufacturers in the U.S. and Europe – 57% and 55%, respectively – expect their economies to improve moderately in 2010. Last year, this key measure of confidence dropped to 26% in the U.S. and nearly collapsed in Europe at 13%.
Join David Brousell, two manufacturers who participated in the poll and Cisco to hear their outlook for 2010.
Hear about:
- how far manufacturing has come since the crisis days of the downturn at the beginning of 2009 but also how far manufacturing still has to go to see a full recovery
- how the recovery plays out in coming months will determine how the higher levels of confidence revealed in the poll translate to decisions around such things as capital spending and hiring
In addition to confidence levels, the poll also examines reader attitudes with regard to technology budget plans and product purchase intentions for 2010.
DIA 60 min. chart
I realize the bitching and moaning is not everyone's cup of tea but the blog is not written by an automated robot. It is written by a human who sees a lie (that you can print your way to prosperity) on full display and sometimes expresses disgust. Don't like it? Move on to blogs and media where things remain more palatable, said Miss Congeniality.
Anyway, back on task, I found an old updating chart of the DIA updating on the chart list. This was originally generated when the market was trying to put in that rounding bottom in late January into February. It sure took a roundabout way to getting toward the target.
Anyway, back on task, I found an old updating chart of the DIA updating on the chart list. This was originally generated when the market was trying to put in that rounding bottom in late January into February. It sure took a roundabout way to getting toward the target.
Inflation
One again, this weekly chart of the t-bond yield hints at the price that policy makers (and the rest of us) are going to pay for the desperate inflationary policy carpet bombed into the economy during Hope '09.
It still says here that the best thing for all would be another deflationary dunk. Now, is the system finally at the saturation point? Has the deflation angle simply been overwhelmed?
We will know soon, and if so, our heroic policy makers will come to be seen as the counterfeiters (Saville's apt label) that they are. Desperation sucks folks. There is nothing organic or healthy about this system as two morally expired political parties pick over the bones and bicker at each other in a shrill and partisan manner.
It still says here that the best thing for all would be another deflationary dunk. Now, is the system finally at the saturation point? Has the deflation angle simply been overwhelmed?
We will know soon, and if so, our heroic policy makers will come to be seen as the counterfeiters (Saville's apt label) that they are. Desperation sucks folks. There is nothing organic or healthy about this system as two morally expired political parties pick over the bones and bicker at each other in a shrill and partisan manner.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Market rebounds
Markets far and wide - interconnected and bound in hope, denial and the need for more destructive and inflationary monetary policy - are rebounding on schedule and to targets as the US dollar, junk bond correction and gold-silver ratio take their anticipated breaks.
I am one simple chart twittler who cannot control markets but I can tell you probabilities and the probability remains that this is a suck in for unsophisticated investors. I do not write this in support of an agenda or investment stance. While guarded with bear postions, personal portfolios are still biased upward with precious metals positions more than primed (in my opinion) to benefit if inflation fears break down the barn door.
Meanwhile, the chart is the chart. SPY did something good last week as it filled a gap, and I will keep a note of that. It now approaches target. If the target breaks, I will need to evaluate my personal stance. The feeble volume argues that it will not be broken but then again, when you are talking about greed and desperation of this level, you justnever know what the pigs are capable of. Well actually, yes we do.
I am one simple chart twittler who cannot control markets but I can tell you probabilities and the probability remains that this is a suck in for unsophisticated investors. I do not write this in support of an agenda or investment stance. While guarded with bear postions, personal portfolios are still biased upward with precious metals positions more than primed (in my opinion) to benefit if inflation fears break down the barn door.
Meanwhile, the chart is the chart. SPY did something good last week as it filled a gap, and I will keep a note of that. It now approaches target. If the target breaks, I will need to evaluate my personal stance. The feeble volume argues that it will not be broken but then again, when you are talking about greed and desperation of this level, you just
Anyone surprised?
The 3 Amigos of liquidity consolidate and the hope pump revs up again. You could see this coming a mile away as each of these indicators got too frothy as the bull trend followers ran for perceived safety. Now, can the bulls actually break the indicators and send the bears back to the deflationary hell they came from? Now that would be quite an achievement, unlikely though it is.
Monetary Inflation & the Fed's Exit Strategy -- Saville
NFTRH and the blog have been following the various measures of the treasury bond market's line in the sand - the 100 month exponential moving average on the long bond - for some time now. It is of utmost importance to people who want to get a step ahead of Bernanke's "playbook" as Steve Saville calls it. For readers who may not be clear on what I am talking about, here is Saville with a really good explanation as to the interdependence between the treasury bond market and the Fed's ability to do what they ALWAYS seek to do, inflate the money supply: Monetary Inflation & the Fed's Exit Strategy
Monday, February 15, 2010
NFTRH 1 Year Ago... They Said It
From NFTRH20 dated 2/14/10:
They Said It
“If only we hadn’t had those [Bush] tax cuts, we would be in better shape for dealing with the crisis now. But the trouble with tax cuts, just forgetting about value judgments is that a dollar of tax cuts may translate into quite a lot less than a dollar of additional spending. We have an economy that’s suffering from insufficient demand, ah, tax cuts are not… they don’t give good bang for the buck in dealing with this kind of crisis whereas if the government goes out there and hires people to repair a bridge that’s about to fall down, that not only fixes the bridge but it also contributes directly to the economy.” – Paul Krugman (per Bloomberg video: http://tinyurl.com/dxfben)
Paul Krugman and Robert Reich are getting a lot of air time as the public looks to these economic experts for their views from on high in its time of need. The public is looking to the learned opinions of people whose entire economic orientation (fiat money creation and associated spending) has resulted in total failure. It is the perfect illustration of the metaphor of trying to save an overdosed junkie with a mainline of pure heroin.
Government is getting bigger, the money supply is increasing and while intentions are somewhat benevolent right now, projecting a few years down the road, we can see very dark possibilities; we can see individual saving (and prudence) having been discouraged in the interest of spending our way out of this mess (at the cost of our children’s future), people dependent on big government and one grand, and global, inflation problem.
“The jobs the American people care about most -- their own -- will be dramatically safer the day that President Obama signs this plan into law” – Nancy Pelosi
From Bloomberg: “The stimulus plan provides a half-trillion dollars for jobless benefits, renewable energy projects, highway construction, food stamps, broadband, Pell college tuition grants, high-speed rail projects and scores of other programs. It raises the nation’s debt limit to about $12 trillion.”
This is a new New Deal gone steroidal and it is designed to save some jobs in the short term, not to mention enrich those highly connected with government. Raising the already unpayable debt limit is no doubt an inside joke, and it seems we are doing everything that hubris choked, late stage societies would be expected to do in their moment of maximum denial. The result is going to be a delay in reckoning with the final meltdown as a bankrupt system lurches forward killing itself with ever more of its own failed policy.
“I think everyone in this chamber on both sides of the aisle understands we need to act,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner , an Ohio Republican. “But a bill that’s supposed to be about jobs, jobs, jobs has turned into a bill that’s all about spending, spending and spending.” – Bloomberg
Where were these kind of Republicans when we needed them to stand up to the Bush administration? If not for Republican failure to act Republican at crucial times, we would not have Democrats in control and simply doing what Democrats do.
Meanwhile, the G7 weighs in: “We reaffirm our commitment to act together using the full range of policy tools to support growth and employment and strengthen the financial sector,” said the draft statement, which was obtained by Bloomberg News. “The stabilization of the global economy and financial markets remains our highest priority.”
And Goldman sums it up: “More is better,” said Jim O’Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. “People have had their confidence shattered.”
Well Jim, perhaps in the long run shattered confidence is exactly what ‘people’ need. Do they really need to be compelled to have confidence in your company, your industry and what has been proved to be an illegitimate way of redistributing wealth? Eh, Jim? More is not better. More is gluttonous. Saving is better. Cleansing is better. But of course it is too late for that.
Honestly dear subscribers, I feel as though we have been stuck in the same cartoon for far too long as we watch these people try to rebuild a failed construct. It is like watching the Coyote suspended in air, holding a heavy hunk of iron and a deeply embedded philosophy "Fail again, only next time, fail better." http://tinyurl.com/bq2j7b
Oh yes, NFTRH72 is out now -- actually yesterday. A year has gone by since the market began its final decent into the wash out lows that sprung Hope '09. There are crosscurrents in the precious metals and the broad market is on the relief bounce. Time to be alert.
They Said It
“If only we hadn’t had those [Bush] tax cuts, we would be in better shape for dealing with the crisis now. But the trouble with tax cuts, just forgetting about value judgments is that a dollar of tax cuts may translate into quite a lot less than a dollar of additional spending. We have an economy that’s suffering from insufficient demand, ah, tax cuts are not… they don’t give good bang for the buck in dealing with this kind of crisis whereas if the government goes out there and hires people to repair a bridge that’s about to fall down, that not only fixes the bridge but it also contributes directly to the economy.” – Paul Krugman (per Bloomberg video: http://tinyurl.com/dxfben)
Paul Krugman and Robert Reich are getting a lot of air time as the public looks to these economic experts for their views from on high in its time of need. The public is looking to the learned opinions of people whose entire economic orientation (fiat money creation and associated spending) has resulted in total failure. It is the perfect illustration of the metaphor of trying to save an overdosed junkie with a mainline of pure heroin.
Government is getting bigger, the money supply is increasing and while intentions are somewhat benevolent right now, projecting a few years down the road, we can see very dark possibilities; we can see individual saving (and prudence) having been discouraged in the interest of spending our way out of this mess (at the cost of our children’s future), people dependent on big government and one grand, and global, inflation problem.
“The jobs the American people care about most -- their own -- will be dramatically safer the day that President Obama signs this plan into law” – Nancy Pelosi
From Bloomberg: “The stimulus plan provides a half-trillion dollars for jobless benefits, renewable energy projects, highway construction, food stamps, broadband, Pell college tuition grants, high-speed rail projects and scores of other programs. It raises the nation’s debt limit to about $12 trillion.”
This is a new New Deal gone steroidal and it is designed to save some jobs in the short term, not to mention enrich those highly connected with government. Raising the already unpayable debt limit is no doubt an inside joke, and it seems we are doing everything that hubris choked, late stage societies would be expected to do in their moment of maximum denial. The result is going to be a delay in reckoning with the final meltdown as a bankrupt system lurches forward killing itself with ever more of its own failed policy.
“I think everyone in this chamber on both sides of the aisle understands we need to act,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner , an Ohio Republican. “But a bill that’s supposed to be about jobs, jobs, jobs has turned into a bill that’s all about spending, spending and spending.” – Bloomberg
Where were these kind of Republicans when we needed them to stand up to the Bush administration? If not for Republican failure to act Republican at crucial times, we would not have Democrats in control and simply doing what Democrats do.
Meanwhile, the G7 weighs in: “We reaffirm our commitment to act together using the full range of policy tools to support growth and employment and strengthen the financial sector,” said the draft statement, which was obtained by Bloomberg News. “The stabilization of the global economy and financial markets remains our highest priority.”
And Goldman sums it up: “More is better,” said Jim O’Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. “People have had their confidence shattered.”
Well Jim, perhaps in the long run shattered confidence is exactly what ‘people’ need. Do they really need to be compelled to have confidence in your company, your industry and what has been proved to be an illegitimate way of redistributing wealth? Eh, Jim? More is not better. More is gluttonous. Saving is better. Cleansing is better. But of course it is too late for that.
Honestly dear subscribers, I feel as though we have been stuck in the same cartoon for far too long as we watch these people try to rebuild a failed construct. It is like watching the Coyote suspended in air, holding a heavy hunk of iron and a deeply embedded philosophy "Fail again, only next time, fail better." http://tinyurl.com/bq2j7b
Oh yes, NFTRH72 is out now -- actually yesterday. A year has gone by since the market began its final decent into the wash out lows that sprung Hope '09. There are crosscurrents in the precious metals and the broad market is on the relief bounce. Time to be alert.
Friday, February 12, 2010
CoT structure improving greatly
Gold CoT shows commercials continuing to short cover and large speculators getting less long, as open interest continues to decline. This is called purifying the base and is bullish. My gold target is 1000 +/- for the intermediate correction, but this is why I alway say don't worry about the POG and for the love of god, don't try to time exact bottoms in VALUE.
And then we have silver, looking even more impressive (CoT wise, not technically) than his big buttoned down brother.
And then we have silver, looking even more impressive (CoT wise, not technically) than his big buttoned down brother.
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Here's the long bond itself
Monthly chart, also live. In and of itself it says all's normal. The problem is that if the weekly chart hits its targets, it is going to make this ode to convention very abnormal.
Long Bond Yield - Yikes!
The deflation impulse story goes as far as that neck line says it goes. Was that really all there was to our long awaited deflato-rama? Is Prechter back on the shelf already? This is really interesting folks. Here's the weekly chart I have had stored and updating.
LAM.to
Well, the chart doesn't look great (although it did bounce off support) and the near term case for uranium is not overly bullish, but if Mr. Henderson sees fit to buy more in the open market at 1.42, I can at least buy back the ones I sold from my conservative account. Back in @ 1.28.
Silver
I still have a few coins laying around. The ones left after I sold my American Silver Eagles @ 18.50 back in '08. I think silver rounds and junk 90% quarters will be handy in the post-apocalyptic hyperinflationary fiat gorefest. But I am not currently a real silver bull so I was by definition a weak hand on the SLV positions that I just ejected for a whopping .74% gain.
The target is a test of the breakdown from the neck line & 50 day moving average. That could still be in play, and by all means silver bugz have fun.
Best to focus on the real monetary metal for now in the event that that is a bear flag (check the low volume). The drawn out process has put me in no mood to find out.
Edit (11:48) Oh and to those out there using me as a contrary indicator, YOU ARE WELCOME and congrats! Tough racket, this. ;-) I'll have to make due with gold stocks I guess.
The target is a test of the breakdown from the neck line & 50 day moving average. That could still be in play, and by all means silver bugz have fun.
Best to focus on the real monetary metal for now in the event that that is a bear flag (check the low volume). The drawn out process has put me in no mood to find out.
Edit (11:48) Oh and to those out there using me as a contrary indicator, YOU ARE WELCOME and congrats! Tough racket, this. ;-) I'll have to make due with gold stocks I guess.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
HUI-Gold Ratio
The HGR is still on board for a short term rally. Intermediate term it is on a sell, as is the entire PM complex.
Of course that's just technical lingo. How many people who sold gold at say 420 on an intermediate 'sell' signal are left standing sidelines to this day cursing the monetary metal? In fact, maybe that's where gold bashers come from; they could be people who thought about buying at 325 and came up with excuses as to why to chicken out. 420? Oh but Prechter said....
But I digress; despite the PM complex being on a technical 'sell', I will hold my favored positions as usual. But I will raise cash as well, hopefully upon completion of this little would-be rally with the frustrating beginnings. The moving average cluster in the blue box should limit the move (if it ever gets here).
Of course that's just technical lingo. How many people who sold gold at say 420 on an intermediate 'sell' signal are left standing sidelines to this day cursing the monetary metal? In fact, maybe that's where gold bashers come from; they could be people who thought about buying at 325 and came up with excuses as to why to chicken out. 420? Oh but Prechter said....
But I digress; despite the PM complex being on a technical 'sell', I will hold my favored positions as usual. But I will raise cash as well, hopefully upon completion of this little would-be rally with the frustrating beginnings. The moving average cluster in the blue box should limit the move (if it ever gets here).
Does this explain SRS?
Why is SRS, one of my short positions, doing so well despite the market's upward thrust yesterday? One answer could come in the form of this explanation from real estate developer Andy Miller, by way of Safehaven:
An Insider's View of the Real Estate Train Wreck
No one has been more right on the housing market in recent years. So, what's coming next? Some of the housing numbers in the last few months look a little less ugly. Could housing be getting ready to get well?
MILLER: I don't think so.
For all intents and purposes, the United States home mortgage market has been nationalized without anybody noticing. Last September, reportedly over 95% of all new loans for single-family homes in the U.S. were made with federal assistance, either through Fannie Mae and the implied guarantee, or Freddie Mac, or through the FHA.
If it's true that most of the financing in the single-family home market is being facilitated by government guarantees, that should make everybody very, very concerned. If government support goes away, and it will go away, where will that leave the home market? It leaves you with a catastrophe, because private lenders for single-family homes are nervous. Lenders that are still lending are reverting to 75% to 80% loan to value. But that doesn't help a homeowner whose property is worth less than the mortgage. So when the supply of government-facilitated loans dries up, it's going to put the home market in a very, very bad place.
Why am I so certain that the federal government will have to cut back on its lending? Because most of the financing is done via the bond market, through Ginnie Mae or other government agencies. And the numbers are so big that eventually the bond market is going to gag on the government-sponsored paper.
The public doesn't have any idea of the scale of the guarantees the government is taking on through Fannie, Freddie, and FHA. It's huge. If people understood what the federal government has done and subjected the taxpayers to, there would be a public outrage. But you can't get people to focus on it, and it's very esoteric, it's very hard to understand. But it's not something the bond market won't notice. The government can't keep doing what it has been doing to support mortgage lending without pushing interest rates way up.
Refinancings of single-family homes are very interest-rate sensitive. Consumers have their backs against the wall. They have too much debt. Refinancing their maturing mortgages or their adjustable-rate mortgages is very problematic if rates go up, but that's exactly where they're headed. So anyone who's comforted by current statistics on single-family homes should look beyond the data and into the dynamics of the market. What they'll find is very alarming.
An Insider's View of the Real Estate Train Wreck
No one has been more right on the housing market in recent years. So, what's coming next? Some of the housing numbers in the last few months look a little less ugly. Could housing be getting ready to get well?
MILLER: I don't think so.
For all intents and purposes, the United States home mortgage market has been nationalized without anybody noticing. Last September, reportedly over 95% of all new loans for single-family homes in the U.S. were made with federal assistance, either through Fannie Mae and the implied guarantee, or Freddie Mac, or through the FHA.
If it's true that most of the financing in the single-family home market is being facilitated by government guarantees, that should make everybody very, very concerned. If government support goes away, and it will go away, where will that leave the home market? It leaves you with a catastrophe, because private lenders for single-family homes are nervous. Lenders that are still lending are reverting to 75% to 80% loan to value. But that doesn't help a homeowner whose property is worth less than the mortgage. So when the supply of government-facilitated loans dries up, it's going to put the home market in a very, very bad place.
Why am I so certain that the federal government will have to cut back on its lending? Because most of the financing is done via the bond market, through Ginnie Mae or other government agencies. And the numbers are so big that eventually the bond market is going to gag on the government-sponsored paper.
The public doesn't have any idea of the scale of the guarantees the government is taking on through Fannie, Freddie, and FHA. It's huge. If people understood what the federal government has done and subjected the taxpayers to, there would be a public outrage. But you can't get people to focus on it, and it's very esoteric, it's very hard to understand. But it's not something the bond market won't notice. The government can't keep doing what it has been doing to support mortgage lending without pushing interest rates way up.
Refinancings of single-family homes are very interest-rate sensitive. Consumers have their backs against the wall. They have too much debt. Refinancing their maturing mortgages or their adjustable-rate mortgages is very problematic if rates go up, but that's exactly where they're headed. So anyone who's comforted by current statistics on single-family homes should look beyond the data and into the dynamics of the market. What they'll find is very alarming.
Credit contracting?
I know this is treasury day, where Timmy sooth-says the world that the US will ALWAYS retain its AAA bond rating and the need is ever more urgent to sell this debt. Precious metals, commodities and often stocks are zonked good on treasury day.
But the chart, as NFTRH readers know, is an indicator that beyond the noise of the day, credit is looking to contract once again. Junk debt / sound debt ratio is in danger of losing support.
But the chart, as NFTRH readers know, is an indicator that beyond the noise of the day, credit is looking to contract once again. Junk debt / sound debt ratio is in danger of losing support.
Pablum from MarketWatch
Treasurys up before auction, Bernanke testimony
Does anyone still believe this smoke & mirrors stuff?
"We remain of the opinion that inflation hawks need not worry," said T.J. Marta, chief market strategist at Marta on the Markets. "The one positive to come out of the crisis is increased flexibility on the part of the Fed, and they now have many more arrows in their quiver with which to head off inflation -- should such action be necessary."
Does anyone still believe this smoke & mirrors stuff?
"We remain of the opinion that inflation hawks need not worry," said T.J. Marta, chief market strategist at Marta on the Markets. "The one positive to come out of the crisis is increased flexibility on the part of the Fed, and they now have many more arrows in their quiver with which to head off inflation -- should such action be necessary."
Dow in 2010 = Dow of 1929?
Adam at Ino.com thinks it could be so. An interesting video: Deja Vu All Over Again For the Dow?
It's a succinct video that meshes with one of the two primary NFTRH plans. Either way, I agree that there is a date with strong support well lower than here. When we get to that point, it will be time to finalize a decision on NFTRH's 'plan A or plan B'. But Ino uses the triggered down MACD (very important) and retrace points correlating to the crash of '29 and subsequent recovery. I will note that time frames are different (Hope '09 extended longer than Hope 1930), but the structure is very similar.
Anyway, and interesting video. I don't use MarketClub because I tend to use instinct and psychology (for better or worse) as part of my trading. But I am going to be interested to see if the unbiased Ino system generates a RED arrow down.
It's a succinct video that meshes with one of the two primary NFTRH plans. Either way, I agree that there is a date with strong support well lower than here. When we get to that point, it will be time to finalize a decision on NFTRH's 'plan A or plan B'. But Ino uses the triggered down MACD (very important) and retrace points correlating to the crash of '29 and subsequent recovery. I will note that time frames are different (Hope '09 extended longer than Hope 1930), but the structure is very similar.
Anyway, and interesting video. I don't use MarketClub because I tend to use instinct and psychology (for better or worse) as part of my trading. But I am going to be interested to see if the unbiased Ino system generates a RED arrow down.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
SLV & GLD
Time for the gold-silver ratio to take a rest as hope pulls a comeback. As such, I got rid of my GLD but am holding onto all of my SLV (both bought last week per NFTRH71) for a trade. Bet some people never thought they'd see that here on the blog that has seldom given silver much respect. GLD was replaced by GDXJ and HMY for a little upside pizzaz to go with SLV and several other holdings.
Oh but the big play could be in the short positions, which are modest at the moment. So I will now ride PM positions, hopefully to targets in the near term but become ever more focused on where to short this pig going forward. Targets targets everywhere, upside and downside.
Yes, the markets have become fun again. Hope '09 was boring. Of course, they could break down the GSR once again at which point I would have to get my ego in line and reevaluate. But until then, they are not to be trusted. Odds overwhelmingly favor this being a suck in of the contrary indicators who sold last week.
Oh but the big play could be in the short positions, which are modest at the moment. So I will now ride PM positions, hopefully to targets in the near term but become ever more focused on where to short this pig going forward. Targets targets everywhere, upside and downside.
Yes, the markets have become fun again. Hope '09 was boring. Of course, they could break down the GSR once again at which point I would have to get my ego in line and reevaluate. But until then, they are not to be trusted. Odds overwhelmingly favor this being a suck in of the contrary indicators who sold last week.
Greece... Rah rah it's all okay now!!
Everybody back in the water. Especially you AAII individual investors, you NAAIM investment managers and you newsletter writers. Sheesh, you guys backed off your hyper bullish stance all at once, sold and got sidelines unwittingly becoming tools for contrary analysis.
Now get back in there guys! It's okay now.
Just when I was beginning to doubt myself, the great and powerful Oz sweeps Greece under the rug. Just like Dubai. This mess is coming apart at the seams, but first we need to whoop up some misperceptions and get the old greed/fear game going full on.
Now get back in there guys! It's okay now.
Just when I was beginning to doubt myself, the great and powerful Oz sweeps Greece under the rug. Just like Dubai. This mess is coming apart at the seams, but first we need to whoop up some misperceptions and get the old greed/fear game going full on.
US Financials - A Sad Picture
This is a chart I originally did as XLF was breaking up from the downtrend line. This demanded that Fib retrace levels be illustrated to see where hope and greed might abort. Well, look at this pathetic picture. The only thing added today is the red box showing some enthusiastic downside volume. This chart is disgusting.
3 Amigos of Liquidity Stress
No matter how pumpy any short term broad rally might be - and its intention would be to re-instill confidence - the indicators of contraction should drain said confidence soon enough. If a rally does spark, and that is now a big if, it is ill fated say the 3 Amigos.
HUI Weekly
After doing a 15 min. chart showing critical support for subscribers in an email update yesterday, I thought I would dial out Huey to a longer term perspective by weekly chart. This is a stripped down version of a chart NFTRH has used for the last several months to define upside targets (check, 475 long since accomplished), downside supports (we currently sit on the first important one at around the EMA 75, with more below, including a 'no brainer' at which I would be a strong buyer).
Not a great looking picture, is this? There are relief rally targets up above for the eventuality that 'they' sweep Greece and other issues under the rug, plug a mini-denial rally into the grid and shake out some shorts on the broad global markets. The current plan on precious metals equities is to be a seller at these upside targets, and a buyer at strong 'bottom feeder' supports.
A lot of the risk has been bled out of the PM's since December, but I can't help but think that gold is going to get drawn like a bug to a light to the big picture support at or a hair below 1000. Gold stocks? Still roughly correlated as they are to the stock market, I expect more downside before the herd realizes the superior fundamentals in the making.
Let's see what today brings. But one thing I can be firm on is that volatility and misperception lay ahead in all market areas. Governments need to fund their ongoing and inflationary bailout operations. But to do so, they need the lever to pull. The lever is named Prechter. The lever named deflation. The lever that is made of confidence in US treasuries and other global debt paper.
Gold stocks should not - and probably will not - run with the broad markets and commodities once their unique fundamentals are asserted. But for now, they are unfortunately part of the same construct.
Not a great looking picture, is this? There are relief rally targets up above for the eventuality that 'they' sweep Greece and other issues under the rug, plug a mini-denial rally into the grid and shake out some shorts on the broad global markets. The current plan on precious metals equities is to be a seller at these upside targets, and a buyer at strong 'bottom feeder' supports.
A lot of the risk has been bled out of the PM's since December, but I can't help but think that gold is going to get drawn like a bug to a light to the big picture support at or a hair below 1000. Gold stocks? Still roughly correlated as they are to the stock market, I expect more downside before the herd realizes the superior fundamentals in the making.
Let's see what today brings. But one thing I can be firm on is that volatility and misperception lay ahead in all market areas. Governments need to fund their ongoing and inflationary bailout operations. But to do so, they need the lever to pull. The lever is named Prechter. The lever named deflation. The lever that is made of confidence in US treasuries and other global debt paper.
Gold stocks should not - and probably will not - run with the broad markets and commodities once their unique fundamentals are asserted. But for now, they are unfortunately part of the same construct.
Monday, February 8, 2010
Why is it so important to watch the 'indicators'?
Why is it so critical to watch indicators like leading market ratios, sentiment, the ratio of gold to silver, money supply, etc.? Well, one look at this nominal SPX chart provides an answer; trying to figure out the nature of a similar downturn to that of last June/July devolves into a mere guessing game if all you go by is straight technicals on the SPX daily chart.
SPX dumped the neckline of a small H&S topping pattern, spent 4 days below it and then said screw this, time for hope and greed to make a triumphant return. It was right around that point that I began to realize that my projections for the duration of Hope '09 might need to be expanded. Boy, did hope and denial ever expand... right into this latest break.
But it is more complex than simply watching indicators. The gold-silver ratio for example rose strongly in June/July (implying market downside), but broke out of its weekly downtrend line for only one week before falling back. Current weekly GSR has now completed two full weeks of breakout from its most recent downtrend line, has constructed a good looking MACD and formed an inverted H&S bottom pattern.
Yes I know, you have to be a total geekoid get-a-lifer to be into this stuff. Well, if you knew me in real life you would see that I am not very cool and do not display a dynamic personality. But I am into this shit because - call me weird - I just love to make money or at the least, preserve capital and remain as detached from convention as possible. It's the secret recipe of succeeding in the financial markets.
Sorry for the self-involved last paragraph but you must understand, you, the blog reader are all I have got (aside from NFTRH subscribers who actually assign a monetary value to my opinions) when it comes to communicating these things. In real life nobody but nobody wants to hear it. Now that's weird if you ask me. Most people want to make and protect money, but when it comes to the necessary work to do so, it's not happening.
Thus ends another technical analysis post that jumps the track.
SPX dumped the neckline of a small H&S topping pattern, spent 4 days below it and then said screw this, time for hope and greed to make a triumphant return. It was right around that point that I began to realize that my projections for the duration of Hope '09 might need to be expanded. Boy, did hope and denial ever expand... right into this latest break.
But it is more complex than simply watching indicators. The gold-silver ratio for example rose strongly in June/July (implying market downside), but broke out of its weekly downtrend line for only one week before falling back. Current weekly GSR has now completed two full weeks of breakout from its most recent downtrend line, has constructed a good looking MACD and formed an inverted H&S bottom pattern.
Yes I know, you have to be a total geekoid get-a-lifer to be into this stuff. Well, if you knew me in real life you would see that I am not very cool and do not display a dynamic personality. But I am into this shit because - call me weird - I just love to make money or at the least, preserve capital and remain as detached from convention as possible. It's the secret recipe of succeeding in the financial markets.
Sorry for the self-involved last paragraph but you must understand, you, the blog reader are all I have got (aside from NFTRH subscribers who actually assign a monetary value to my opinions) when it comes to communicating these things. In real life nobody but nobody wants to hear it. Now that's weird if you ask me. Most people want to make and protect money, but when it comes to the necessary work to do so, it's not happening.
Thus ends another technical analysis post that jumps the track.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
NFTRH71 Out Now
After the letter is written, proofed and mailed out to subscribers I generally need to take a break from it all. This morning I went out for a run in the err, brisk New England fresh air. Head relatively clear, I can then take another look at the letter and write this 'out now' post before heading out to help coach my kid's softball clinic later.
#71 looks at the strong reversals in many markets, discusses the structure of portfolios in alignment with short, intermediate and long term views and seeks to define what the would-be recovery's nature will be. I have strong feelings in that regard.
Many markets currently remain correlated which, as a precious metals guy, does not make me overly bullish on the intermediate term. Yet profits were taken on most the NFTRH bear positions while PM positions were increased on Friday. Hammer candles are showing up all around, and this includes some areas that give me pause, again from a correlation point of view.
The bottom line is that the trend followers in the newsletter industry, professional money management industry and the AAII (individual investors) quickly came well off their hyper bullish (contrary indicator) stance. This serves as a platform where markets can rally. For a while. But we have definitely exited the tedious phase where every jock on autopilot can make money (or preserve capital).
Full Hubris '10 has likely ended, and now it is time for vigilance.
NFTRH71, out now.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
#71 looks at the strong reversals in many markets, discusses the structure of portfolios in alignment with short, intermediate and long term views and seeks to define what the would-be recovery's nature will be. I have strong feelings in that regard.
Many markets currently remain correlated which, as a precious metals guy, does not make me overly bullish on the intermediate term. Yet profits were taken on most the NFTRH bear positions while PM positions were increased on Friday. Hammer candles are showing up all around, and this includes some areas that give me pause, again from a correlation point of view.
The bottom line is that the trend followers in the newsletter industry, professional money management industry and the AAII (individual investors) quickly came well off their hyper bullish (contrary indicator) stance. This serves as a platform where markets can rally. For a while. But we have definitely exited the tedious phase where every jock on autopilot can make money (or preserve capital).
Full Hubris '10 has likely ended, and now it is time for vigilance.
NFTRH71, out now.
Enjoy the rest of your weekend.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















































