The gold miner bullish stance depends upon periodic destruction of inflationists’
confidence. It depends upon the reserve currency not breaking down catastrophically but
rather, catching the short covering bid. In this environment, gold will out perform nearly
everything except for a time, the USD as it receives the knee jerk benefit of a speculating
herd caught off side and seeking safety. A then very young NFTRH featured a Time
Magazine cover during Q4, 2008, a time during which Robert Prechter led a whole host
of d Boys back to the promised land as these very intelligent and well thought out people
again went into full lecture mode.
Deflationists are finally emerging as evidenced by the well-traveled welling@weeden
report (an interview with Mark Lapolla of Knight Capital) that seems to be everywhere
on the internet of late, including multiple times to my inbox as well as here at Zero
Hedge: http://bit.ly/kvoitR. At the least, it appears that the collective investor psyche is
ready to accept deflation once again.
Perfect, because this chart twittler has been searching for a sign that the ‘continuum’ was
not going to break and the long term US Treasury bond would retain confidence and a bid
other than that of the Federal Reserve or foreign creditors operating a global labor
arbitrage Ponzi racket. Enter welling@weeden.
Yet, it is not enough to simply be a contrary wise guy for the sake of being contrary. We
must entertain the idea that deflationists could be right this time or find valid reasons why
they are not. Otherwise, we are moving forward on unchecked assumptions.
So to put it simply, the NFTRH gold mining stance depends on the d Boys being right
(again) for a time. It depends on government and the Federal Reserve doing what they
have done most intensely since the macro backdrop changed in secular fashion in and
around 2000; meeting any deflation threat with massive and undeniable inflationary
policy. This ultimately leaves true deflation believers holding cash and wondering why
they are not only not buying assets for pennies on the dollar, but watching said assets
rocket higher in response to all the newly created money that transforms into speculative
demand for said assets.
I admit that I have still not had the time to closely read the w@w report, and that may be
a good thing so as I will not be influenced by it as I write what I believe, not what
someone else believes. But in skimming, I have noted some familiar themes.
The report talks about how the Fed can create all the money it wants, but this money
cannot make it to Main Street due to the impairment of real estate, and “no collateral” by
the washed out public. It promotes the familiar theme that the credit binge cannot
possibly continue to expand and debt must be unwound, as the system is at the end of an
epic cycle of what I will call ‘something for nothing’.
There is nothing wrong with this analysis because, in my opinion, it is reality. The
interview goes on to talk of China vs. Silicon valley and as the overly intellectual
deflationists usually do, complicates things too much in my opinion. I swear that the d
Boys can be victims of the their own superior intellect because damned, they are right;
Prechter was a big influence on me a decade ago. He made sense in everything I read of
him, including the need for the massive credit construct to melt down and the inability of
the Federal Reserve to prevent said meltdown.
The newsletter is called Notes From the Rabbit Hole because I have read the book, seen
the movie and lived the reality for so long, knowing how right the case for deflation is,
and yet it never seems to become actualized.
The Fed cannot save Main Street, but that does not stop the Wizard from trying. The
problem is that newly created money does not go to Main Street – and if I want to think
really negatively, I wonder if it was ever intended to – but rather, it enriches the first
abusers and privileged classes. It also helps out you and me, if we are sharp enough to
preserve capital when appropriate and then deploy capital (being brave when others have
I think a lot of deflationist theory – and ill conceived inflationist theory for that matter –
depends on the idea that prices, jobs, wages, etc. have anything to do with anything.
Inflation is promoted and actualized, regardless of jobs, wages or what have you. The
money is going somewhere, but after its creation, I can assure you that it is not saying
“hey, here I am newly minted funny munny; I think I will denominate myself in the
hands of the bust-out public so they can buy some ‘cheap’ real estate – or better yet,
pay off legacy mortgage debt.” No, this money goes where the action is first and
foremost. It goes to the precious metals, led by gold as fear is at a maximum, and later,
as some shreds of confidence return, silver and on outward to the greater commodity,
resources and emerging market sphere. In other words, the play is on and a new cycle
kicks in, money seeks out value and productivity.
Back to the w@w interview… Mr. Lapolla talks a lot about the consumer, about jobs
and about the need to restructure and save. Credit cannot expand forever, no matter the
Fed’s wishes. The old system is failing. Sound familiar? It is core to this newsletter.
But this does not stop inflation and, it can be argued, is a major enabler of future inflation
initiatives, as long as the public remains bamboozled and retains its core confidence in
policy makers, which it does. We will know confidence, wheither real or ginned up by T
bond market manipulation – is lost when the upper line breaks:
Mr. Lapolla goes into many familiar deflation rationalizations, showing how well
intellectuals tend to follow the bread crumbs conveniently laid out for them. They do not
miss a thing, except the reality of how the cycles ultimately have played out up to this
point. Here I will repeat something written often in the past… deflation is trying to
happen continually during the great and ongoing inflation, and periodically it bubbles up
to the surface and becomes a major concern as it would ‘correct’ the malfeasance
promoted through modern monetary policy.
So I guess ultimately I am a d Boy, because I believe deflation is the right and good
corrective needed to end what I consider a somewhat vile system that is geared to enrich
the rich beyond what is deserved, if not beyond their wildest dreams, and impoverish the
struggling and the poor (ie. non-investor classes), even as they generally have little clue
why they continually fall behind (it must be the evil oil cartels and/or ‘speculators’
cranking up gas prices, illegal immigrants taking jobs and respective core beliefs of ‘the
liberals’ and the ‘the conservatives’ doing the damage. These are of course in play, but it
seems that the man behind the curtain, running the Money Show is the source of
discontent through unequal distribution, not a would-be savior of Main Street.
I do not find much of anything above that I disagree with, aside from the first sentence,
which then throws everything that comes after it out of whack. Of course credit creation
cannot be controlled. If it could, it might be controlled into areas that benefit the
economy and its ability to sustainably grow and prosper. But that is a different fairy tale.
We are in Wonderland.
Here, the deflationist reveals the point at which the argument fails. The analysis is based
on the lagging prices that so many people think of as inflation. Hell, the FOMC in its
own official releases refers to inflation being under control because wages and prices
generally are. Well, wages certainly are, and so too I suppose are prices after enough
massaging has been done to the numbers and the goods measured.
Get this, wages are not and never were slated to rise in this cycle. Jobs? Who the hell
cares? This is about getting money out there to the effect of ever diminishing returns in
the areas that do not offer value propositions like the debt saturated consumer (and by
extension, the jobs market). This speaks to the core point of why inflationary policy is
destructive; money is created but cannot be controlled in its destination.
So analysis that talks about monetary policy not working because ‘money’ is not getting
out there to the jobs market and thus driving up wages and inflation, is way off the mark.
Inflation is getting out there alright, just look at gold’s firm and steady bull market.
Commodities, while subject to periodic declines and even crashes as deflationary events
kick up, thus far have risen strongly in response to each inflation cycle (again, defined
here as increased money supply by policy).
But if analysis is going to focus on ‘asset deflation’ then okay, we will have a bout of
asset deflation, but a better term would be ‘asset price destruction’ because that is what
would be in play. As long as the continuum remains intact, actual inflation (policy) will
remain in play, to the upside bias of asset prices again one day.